Pipe Belt Maven · 5 October 2026

Installation location atlas

All 121 site, system and phase records. Named facilities, tentative matches and unresolved locations remain separate from conveyor alignments.

121Register records reviewed
51Facility references · belt untraced
33Tentative facility matches
31Unresolved or unnamed locations
Vikram Ispat · Facility located · belt untracedIndo Gulf / Birla Copper · Approximate route mappedChanda cement conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedCoromandel ground-rock transfer / CKIT 08 · Tentative facility matchTadipatri clinker conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedMadras Cement 70 m conveyor · Tentative facility matchRichards Bay phosphate conveyor 14 · Tentative facility matchRichards Bay phosphate conveyor 15 · Tentative facility matchCoromandel 167 m conveyor · Tentative facility matchCoromandel 270 m project · Tentative facility matchVikram Cement 400 m project · Tentative facility matchSterlite LDC bauxite project · Tentative facility matchVedanta Alumina 480 m project · Tentative facility matchCoromandel 135 m project · Tentative facility matchCoromandel 108 m project · Tentative facility matchDalmha Cement (Bharat) 260 m project · Tentative facility matchDalmha Cement (Bharat) 278 m project · Tentative facility matchDalmha Cement (Bharat) 150 m project · Tentative facility matchDalmha Cement (Bharat) 142 m project · Tentative facility matchDalmha Cement (Bharat) 184 m project · Tentative facility matchPuerto Abierto · Facility located · belt untracedMundra port pipe conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedMahagenco Bhatadi · Facility located · belt untracedRizhao original three-conveyor system · Tentative facility matchNayong · Tentative facility matchNucor Louisiana · Facility located · belt untracedSalobo · Facility located · belt untracedNeptune Terminals · Facility located · belt untracedPecém / CIPP TC2 and TC3 · Facility located · belt untracedMaritsa coal conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedItaqui · Facility located · belt untracedNucor Alabama · Tentative facility matchWangting · Tentative facility matchIPMOMI · Tentative facility matchLedvice phase 1 · Facility located · belt untracedLedvice phase 2 · Facility located · belt untracedGhent power station CCR conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedLinz AG waste-to-energy conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedShandong / Rizhao two-conveyor expansion · Tentative facility matchCallao concentrate export conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedPortlandzementwerk Wittekind · Facility located · belt untracedDyckerhoff Lengerich · Facility located · belt untracedCiments Vigier 244 m pipe conveyor · Tentative facility matchČEZ Mělník · Facility located · belt untracedCementownia Warta · Facility located · belt untracedPT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa · Tentative facility matchHamm / Westfalen power plant · Facility located · belt untracedMaasvlakte power plant pipe conveyor · Tentative facility matchSaguenay multiuser port conveyor · Approximate project route mappedJSW Toranagallu / Bellary long pipe system · Facility located · belt untracedO. P. Jindal / Jindal Power Raigarh · Facility located · belt untracedSembcorp Gayatri port-to-plant conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedTPCIL / Sembcorp Energy India port-to-plant conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedACC 2.4 km limestone conveyor, site unresolved · Tentative facility matchVale Miski Mayo pipe conveyor · Tentative facility matchJSW Dolvi return-strand pipe conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedUdangudi sea-route pipe conveyor system · Facility located · belt untracedKulda / Garjanbahal to Sardega CHP project · Facility located · belt untracedReftinskaya GRES hot-ash conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedSkyline mine BC-8 · Approximate route mappedHKM Duisburg coal handling · Facility located · belt untracedAES Maritza East 1 TC-3A ash conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedQatalum ship-unloader to smelter conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedVigier 944 m limestone conveyor · Tentative facility matchMoorburg power plant pipe-conveyor group · Facility located · belt untracedPetronas RAPID sulphur pipe conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedKoidu diamond-concentrate conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedHidden Valley pit-to-plant conveyor · Tentative facility matchMelaka refinery / Petronas · Facility located · belt untracedAES Barbers Point · Facility located · belt untracedEnnore SEZ CRZ-area pipe conveyors · Facility located · belt untracedNTECL Vallur port-to-plant coal conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedW. H. Sammis gypsum pipe conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedWearmouth Colliery 300 m extension · Tentative facility matchWestoe Colliery to Harton Staithes · Tentative facility matchNuh Cement port/plant pipe transport · Facility located · belt untracedBatı Söke third-line limestone pipe conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedParadeep Phosphates gypsum pipe-conveyor project · Facility located · belt untracedDürnrohr port-to-power-plant coal conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedSchwenk Bernburg alternative-fuel conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedWotan additional BEUMER clinker conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedCrossen–Helmsdorf remediation conveyor · Tentative facility matchPrunéřov II historical ash pipe conveyor · Tentative facility matchMoneypoint ash / FGD pipe-conveyor system · Facility located · belt untracedDenizli two-conveyor alternative-fuel system · Facility located · belt untracedIvano-Frankivsk limestone pipe-conveyor project · Facility located · belt untracedLukavac alternative-fuel pipe-conveyor project · Facility located · belt untracedLagoven Amuay overland conveyor CV-9502 · Approximate route mappedLagoven Amuay wharf conveyor CV-9506 · Approximate route mappedST Paper / ST Tissue Franklin pipe belt · Approximate route mapped
Facility referenceTentative match5 approximate route maps1 approximate project routeClick a marker to inspect its record. Shared-site records overlap.

How to read this atlas

The four earlier maps cover Birla, Skyline and two Lagoven records. Birla is a candidate corridor; Skyline is an approximate imagery trace; Lagoven is a drawing and imagery reconstruction. None is a surveyed alignment.

ST Paper / ST Tissue at Franklin, Virginia was added from a 2022 site-inspection report and archived eight-vertex KMZ path. The path is approximate. Its separate GPS track includes travel outside the mill and is excluded from belt geometry.

Saguenay · Vaudreuil conveyor trace: a supplementary 723 m imagery trace of the visible corridor north of Rue Drake. Belt type is unconfirmed; this is separate from the Grande-Anse port record.

The Grande-Anse port corridor follows retained alignment 8 from the operator’s March 2023 plan. Amber marks the approximate project route; completion and commissioning remain unconfirmed.

The Strategic Resources 2024 project map also supports the roadside port corridor. The proposed pelletizer and stockpile connections shown on that map are separate from the traced port route.

Orange satellite markers are facility or area references. They do not identify head/tail pulleys, belt axes, elevations or pulley dimensions. A located factory does not verify that a particular historical or proposed belt was installed.

Source-register evidence tiers A–D describe the conveyor evidence. The location labels above are an independent assessment. Multiple records can share one site; the 121 records are not a count of individual belts.

31 unresolved records remain explicitly unpinned in this research pass, including four unnamed legacy entries. Current operating state is only stated where supported; historical closure, dismantling and planned-project notes are retained.

All atlas records and sources

Browse the location assessments below or use the interactive atlas above. Installation evidence and location confidence are separate; a facility reference does not establish a surveyed conveyor route or current operation.

Finland pulp conveyor 01 · Finland

Unnamed legacy entry · Installation evidence tier C

  • Register does not identify the installation owner/plant. Country alone is insufficient to locate the conveyor; no invented map pin.
  • The linked project page contains unfilled information fields and does not identify the customer or town.

Sources and location provenance

Finland pulp conveyor 02 · Finland

Unnamed legacy entry · Installation evidence tier C

  • Register does not identify the installation owner/plant. Country alone is insufficient to locate the conveyor; no invented map pin.
  • The linked project page contains unfilled information fields and does not identify the customer or town.

Sources and location provenance

Vikram Ispat · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Vikram Ispat → Welspun Maxsteel → JSW Steel Salav alias chain is explicitly given in the operator’s 2016 Salav port feasibility report. The historical pipe-conveyor route remains unresolved.

Sources and location provenance

Indo Gulf / Birla Copper · India

Approximate route mapped · Installation evidence tier B

  • Candidate northern corridor visually traced from current Apple imagery; historic identity and endpoints unverified
  • CKIT reports February 1999 commissioning and an upgrade in 2004; capacity differences may reflect the upgrade or different materials.

Sources and location provenance

Sweden coal conveyors 05-06 · Sweden

Unnamed legacy entry · Installation evidence tier C

  • Register does not identify the installation owner/plant. Country alone is insufficient to locate the conveyor; no invented map pin.
  • The linked project page contains unfilled information fields and does not identify the customer or town.

Sources and location provenance

Chanda cement conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

Coromandel ground-rock transfer / CKIT 08 · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Visakhapatnam fertilizer works is a plausible Coromandel lead. Historical CKIT transfer belts and planned projects are not individually matched; Coromandel has other production sites.
  • Matched to CKIT row 08 by customer, supplier technology, material and 2001–2002 timing. This identity match is an inference; the annual report does not give length, diameter, capacity or the February commissioning date.
  • Displayed technical values and 2002 commissioning year remain CKIT’s legacy claims. The operator gives 2001 as technology-import year, a different event basis; it is not a conflicting commissioning date.

Sources and location provenance

Hindalco coal conveyors 09-10 · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Tadipatri clinker conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Tadipatri plant reference. The historical clinker belt still needs an individual route match.

Sources and location provenance

Madras Cement 70 m conveyor · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier C

  • Ramco Alathiyur is a facility lead only: the CKIT record names Madras Cement without the plant. Asset correspondence is unproven.
  • The first material name is unclear in the source; it has not been silently normalized.

Sources and location provenance

Richards Bay mineral-products conveyor · South Africa

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Richards Bay phosphate conveyor 14 · South Africa

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier C

  • Foskor is a plausible phosphate-site lead at Richards Bay. CKIT does not name the operator; records 14 and 15 remain separate and unassigned.

Sources and location provenance

Richards Bay phosphate conveyor 15 · South Africa

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier C

  • Foskor is a plausible phosphate-site lead at Richards Bay. CKIT does not name the operator; records 14 and 15 remain separate and unassigned.

Sources and location provenance

Nirma limestone conveyor · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Coromandel 167 m conveyor · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier C

  • Visakhapatnam fertilizer works is a plausible Coromandel lead. Historical CKIT transfer belts and planned projects are not individually matched; Coromandel has other production sites.

Sources and location provenance

Coromandel 270 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Visakhapatnam fertilizer works is a plausible Coromandel lead. Historical CKIT transfer belts and planned projects are not individually matched; Coromandel has other production sites.

Sources and location provenance

Vikram Cement 400 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Native result is on the staff-colony road at the Khor works. Planned 2004 CKIT conveyor has not been identified in current imagery.

Sources and location provenance

Sterlite LDC bauxite project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Lanjigarh refinery is a candidate for the historical Vedanta/Sterlite entries. The 5 km Sterlite LDC and 480 m Vedanta proposals cannot be identified individually.

Sources and location provenance

Vedanta Alumina 480 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Lanjigarh refinery is a candidate for the historical Vedanta/Sterlite entries. The 5 km Sterlite LDC and 480 m Vedanta proposals cannot be identified individually.

Sources and location provenance

Coromandel 135 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Visakhapatnam fertilizer works is a plausible Coromandel lead. Historical CKIT transfer belts and planned projects are not individually matched; Coromandel has other production sites.

Sources and location provenance

Coromandel 108 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Visakhapatnam fertilizer works is a plausible Coromandel lead. Historical CKIT transfer belts and planned projects are not individually matched; Coromandel has other production sites.

Sources and location provenance

Dalmha Cement (Bharat) 260 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Dalmiapuram is supported as a site with pipe transport by Dalmia’s 2019 filing. Individual correspondence to the five CKIT planned projects is unproven.
  • Dalmia’s 2019 submission describes existing limestone, coal/lignite and wet-fly-ash/gypsum pipe transport at Dalmiapuram. These site-level observations cannot yet be assigned to the five CKIT planned assets, so no extra overlapping site record has been counted.
  • Holtec lists a 298 m / 150 t/h coal project at Dalmiapuram. CKIT lists two coal/lignite projects, 260 m and 278 m, with the same capacity; the match is ambiguous.

Sources and location provenance

Dalmha Cement (Bharat) 278 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Dalmiapuram is supported as a site with pipe transport by Dalmia’s 2019 filing. Individual correspondence to the five CKIT planned projects is unproven.
  • Dalmia’s 2019 submission describes existing limestone, coal/lignite and wet-fly-ash/gypsum pipe transport at Dalmiapuram. These site-level observations cannot yet be assigned to the five CKIT planned assets, so no extra overlapping site record has been counted.
  • Holtec lists a 298 m / 150 t/h coal project at Dalmiapuram. CKIT lists two coal/lignite projects, 260 m and 278 m, with the same capacity; the match is ambiguous.

Sources and location provenance

Dalmha Cement (Bharat) 150 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Dalmiapuram is supported as a site with pipe transport by Dalmia’s 2019 filing. Individual correspondence to the five CKIT planned projects is unproven.
  • Dalmia’s 2019 submission describes existing limestone, coal/lignite and wet-fly-ash/gypsum pipe transport at Dalmiapuram. These site-level observations cannot yet be assigned to the five CKIT planned assets, so no extra overlapping site record has been counted.
  • Holtec lists a 154 m / 500 t/h limestone project at Dalmiapuram. Matching duty/capacity and similar length make it a correlation lead, not proof of the same asset or measurement basis.

Sources and location provenance

Dalmha Cement (Bharat) 142 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Dalmiapuram is supported as a site with pipe transport by Dalmia’s 2019 filing. Individual correspondence to the five CKIT planned projects is unproven.
  • Dalmia’s 2019 submission describes existing limestone, coal/lignite and wet-fly-ash/gypsum pipe transport at Dalmiapuram. These site-level observations cannot yet be assigned to the five CKIT planned assets, so no extra overlapping site record has been counted.
  • Holtec lists a 148 m / 1200 t/h limestone project at Dalmiapuram. Matching duty/capacity and similar length make it a correlation lead, not proof of the same asset or measurement basis.

Sources and location provenance

Dalmha Cement (Bharat) 184 m project · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier D

  • Dalmiapuram is supported as a site with pipe transport by Dalmia’s 2019 filing. Individual correspondence to the five CKIT planned projects is unproven.
  • Dalmia’s 2019 submission describes existing limestone, coal/lignite and wet-fly-ash/gypsum pipe transport at Dalmiapuram. These site-level observations cannot yet be assigned to the five CKIT planned assets, so no extra overlapping site record has been counted.
  • Holtec lists a 190 m / 250 t/h gypsum project at Dalmiapuram. Matching duty/capacity and similar length make it a correlation lead, not proof of the same asset or measurement basis.

Sources and location provenance

Puerto Abierto · Chile

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Puerto Andino identified in Mejillones. New soda-ash warehouse/pipe route remains untraced; source construction date is not commissioning.
  • 2025 is labeled construction year; the page does not separately date commissioning.

Sources and location provenance

Kurmitar iron ore · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Mundra port pipe conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Port complex reference only. The six-kilometre source route and the receiving coal facility are not traced.

Sources and location provenance

Dibba / Fujairah · United Arab Emirates

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Chinalco Fangcheng · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Mahagenco Bhatadi · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Mine location reference; Mahagenco pipe route to the generating station remains unresolved.

Sources and location provenance

Yubei Section B · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Rizhao original three-conveyor system · China

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Two major steelworks are present: Rizhao Steel Holding Group and Shandong Steel Rizhao. Supplier names and individual flights require reconciliation; no shared route is assumed.

Sources and location provenance

Yangquan · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Kailin II · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Nayong · China

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Nayong-1 power station is a lead; the source does not uniquely distinguish the Nayong generating sites.

Sources and location provenance

Nucor Louisiana · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.
  • Detailed feature text gives 4,140 t/h carry and 3,800 t/h return; the headline table gives 4,000 t/h. Bidirectional capacity is not a sum.

Sources and location provenance

Salobo · Brazil

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Mine-complex reference. Do not interpret the locality coordinate as a pulley location; two conveyor flights require identification.

Sources and location provenance

Yong Steel · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

CNOOC coke system · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Kailin I parallel conveyors · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Changshu three-conveyor system · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Neptune Terminals · Canada

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

Pecém / CIPP TC2 and TC3 · Brazil

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Port complex reference. TC-2 and TC-3 remain individually untraced.

Sources and location provenance

Maritsa coal conveyor · Bulgaria

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • AES Galabovo facility reference. Coal transport and TC-3A ash transport remain separate records; neither pin identifies its head/tail.
  • Keep separate from the AES Maritza East 1 TC-3A ash conveyor. The similarly sized, unnamed Bulgarian example in the SME 2012 paper is a correlation lead only.

Sources and location provenance

Itaqui · Brazil

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • São Luís power-plant location; not the unrelated city Balsas. Port-to-plant pipe route unresolved.

Sources and location provenance

Zhenghai · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Nucor Alabama · United States

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • CDI says Alabama without a plant. Decatur/Trinity is one candidate; Nucor also operates Tuscaloosa. Do not treat this pin as the conveyor location.
  • The overview does not identify conveyor count, material, or a separate commissioning date.

Sources and location provenance

Hongyuan · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • The overview does not identify conveyor count, material, or a separate commissioning date.

Sources and location provenance

Wangting · China

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Wangting generating complex is a defensible site lead; CDI’s overview does not identify the specific pipe-conveyor plant unit or route.
  • The overview does not identify conveyor count, material, or a separate commissioning date.

Sources and location provenance

IPMOMI · Indonesia

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • IPMOMI is a Paiton operation/maintenance lead. Multiple power plants share this complex; the CDI pipe asset and phase are not uniquely located.
  • The overview does not identify conveyor count, material, or a separate commissioning date.

Sources and location provenance

MBE pipe conveyor, unspecified site · India

Unnamed legacy entry · Installation evidence tier B

  • Register does not identify the installation owner/plant. Country alone is insufficient to locate the conveyor; no invented map pin.
  • The overview does not identify conveyor count, material, or a separate commissioning date.

Sources and location provenance

Ledvice phase 1 · Czech Republic

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

Ledvice phase 2 · Czech Republic

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.
  • Description explicitly says double line; technical block gives one 320 m dimension, interpreted as a per-conveyor value rather than total system length.

Sources and location provenance

Ghent power station CCR conveyor · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Ghent plant matched; CCR disposal route changes and conveyor endpoints require site drawings.
  • Independent plant reference agrees with the mapped industrial site.
  • Whitepaper capacity is 1,200 short tons/h, approximately 1,089 metric t/h; this is a unit conversion, not a capacity conflict.

Sources and location provenance

Linz AG waste-to-energy conveyor · Austria

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • RHKW boiler-house reference at Linz Mitte. Operator confirms pipe transport from preparation facility in the Tankhafen area; route remains unresolved.
  • Closer satellite view retained. It does not unambiguously isolate the 460 m pipe from the other elevated industrial links; no route was traced.
  • 2011 is the power plant’s operating date in the case; a distinct pipe-conveyor commissioning year has not been established.

Sources and location provenance

Shandong / Rizhao two-conveyor expansion · China

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Two major steelworks are present: Rizhao Steel Holding Group and Shandong Steel Rizhao. Supplier names and individual flights require reconciliation; no shared route is assumed.
  • Commissioning was around January 2019 by inference; exact date/year is left unset.
  • The supplier describes additional conveyors supporting an existing system. Keep separate from CDI’s 8 km / three-conveyor reference.

Sources and location provenance

Callao concentrate export conveyor · Peru

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Terminal perimeter reference only, not conveyor head or pulley axis. Three-kilometre concentrates route remains untraced.
  • The 2023 brochure/publication date is not a commissioning date. Operator legal identity still needs a direct operator source.

Sources and location provenance

Portlandzementwerk Wittekind · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Erwitte works matched. Nearby quarries and other Erwitte cement producers are not substituted for this plant.

Sources and location provenance

Dyckerhoff Lengerich · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Industrial works matched at Lengerich; the bus-stop result was rejected. Two recorded conveyors remain individually unassigned.
  • For two conveyors, the brochure’s single length is not assumed to be each conveyor or their sum.

Sources and location provenance

Ciments Vigier 244 m pipe conveyor · Switzerland

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • The supplier and operator identify Reuchenette / Rondchâtel. Archive coordinate is an area reference only. The 244 m BEUMER and 944 m KOCH records remain separate; neither is assigned to a surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

ČEZ Mělník · Czech Republic

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

Cementownia Warta · Poland

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa · Indonesia

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Citeureup is a candidate among Indocement’s multiple plants; source-to-conveyor site correspondence is unproven. OSM result is the captive power facility, not a pipe endpoint.

Sources and location provenance

Hamm / Westfalen power plant · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Westfalen power-station reference; the two supplier equipment codes are not interpreted as independently surveyed routes.
  • Equipment code: 2 x PC400x385. Dimensions are not decoded without a published code definition; plant throughput is not assigned to each pipe conveyor.

Sources and location provenance

Maasvlakte power plant pipe conveyor · Netherlands

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • MPP3 is a plausible E.ON/Uniper plant reference within Maasvlakte. Exact historical FAM pipe asset correspondence remains unverified.
  • Equipment code: PC400x540. The reference gives several plant materials and throughputs without clearly assigning them to the pipe conveyor.

Sources and location provenance

Saguenay multiuser port conveyor · Canada

Approximate project route mapped · Installation evidence tier D

  • Retained alignment 8 on the operator’s March 2023 presentation, page 6, reconstructed approximately using the storage yard, curved access road and quay building.
  • Strategic Resources’ 2024 Pellet Project map also shows the port corridor following Chemin Grande-Anse between the industrial transfer area and the quay. It supports the selected corridor; the 23 trace vertices remain based on the clearer operator plan and MapKit landmarks.
  • The pelletizer and stockpile connections drawn on the Strategic Resources map are separate from this port-corridor trace. Their individual conveyor types, endpoints and lengths are not assigned.
  • Mapped horizontal corridor: approximately 1.77 km. Operator project description: 1.8 km; supplier reference: roughly 2 km. These are distinct measurement bases.
  • The Strategic Resources figure is a project layout from 2024 and does not establish completed construction or commissioning. MapKit imagery appears to predate the conveyor; operator photographs show construction.
  • The 2023 presentation’s seven rejected alternatives are excluded. Additional terminal and stockyard conveyors are not traced.
  • Do not promote the supplier’s expected 2025 operating date to actual commissioning. Homepage wording can lag events; completion remains unconfirmed.

Sources and location provenance

JSW Toranagallu / Bellary long pipe system · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Derived plant-area midpoint. This view covers the receiving works, not the complete 20.9 km Nandihalli system.
  • Conveyor count is not established by the primary pages reviewed. A multi-conveyor system total is not a single-flight length.

Sources and location provenance

O. P. Jindal / Jindal Power Raigarh · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Derived site-area midpoint; not a measured asset location. The mine-to-plant pipe route and later capacity upgrade require confirmation.
  • An order announced in 2022 would raise capacity from 1,500 to 2,000 t/h; completion of that upgrade was not verified. Do not overwrite the installed reference capacity.

Sources and location provenance

Sembcorp Gayatri port-to-plant conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • NCC/Sembcorp Gayatri facility reference north of the separate Thermal Powertech site. The 7.5 km route is not interchanged with TPCIL’s 4.8 km route.
  • Macmet’s 2019 video names two Sembcorp conveyors at Nellore but does not label the individual route/specification correspondence. It does not resolve commissioning evidence for this record.

Sources and location provenance

TPCIL / Sembcorp Energy India port-to-plant conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Thermal Powertech facility reference, distinct from Sembcorp Gayatri. Krishnapatnam port connection remains untraced.
  • Macmet’s 2019 video names two Sembcorp conveyors at Nellore but does not label the individual route/specification correspondence. It does not resolve commissioning evidence for this record.

Sources and location provenance

ACC 2.4 km limestone conveyor, site unresolved · India

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Macmet’s current page names Chanda; an older brochure copy names Chaibasa for a similar-length system. Chanda is retained as a candidate only. This record is not merged with CKIT Chanda.
  • Official webpage names Chanda. A third-party copy of an older Macmet brochure names Chaibasa for a 2,402 m system. Keep one unresolved record and seek the original brochure or operator confirmation; do not add a duplicate.
  • ACC’s 2021 Rajanka submission names a Chaibasa mine-to-plant pipe-conveyor route with an 800 t/h capacity, but no length or supplier. Its future-tense transport wording does not resolve whether it is the same 1,000 t/h Macmet asset.

Sources and location provenance

Vale Miski Mayo pipe conveyor · Peru

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Bayóvar drying plant/port is a candidate terminal area. This point does not identify the 3,500 t/h pipe flight or its mine-side endpoint.

Sources and location provenance

JSW Dolvi return-strand pipe conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.

Sources and location provenance

Tata Steel West Bokaro pipe conveyor · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • Other shorter West Bokaro conveyors in third-party brochure copies have not been added without a primary source.
  • The operator rounds the route to 4 km; the supplier homepage rounds it to 3.9 km. These approximate reports are compatible at this precision; no exact surveyed length has been obtained.
  • Inauguration is recorded separately from commissioning. Shorter West Bokaro assets remain outside this record.

Sources and location provenance

Udangudi sea-route pipe conveyor system · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Power-plant site reference. The 17.6 km source value is for the conveyor system and does not establish one single flight or its route.
  • The 2020 order specified 3,000 t/h rated and 3,300 t/h design capacity. The 2021 contractor report identifies two pipe conveyors of 3,000 tonnes/h.
  • The contractor’s August 2024 completion statement establishes its delivered scope, not the date of full-load acceptance of every conveyor duty or plant commercial operation.
  • The 17.6 km supplier system total and around 9 km contractor route description likely have different aggregation bases; the two-conveyor configuration supports that possibility, but an asset-level reconciliation is still needed.
  • February 2026 reporting gives more than 1,200 t/h during the trial and 2,000 t/h evacuation-system capacity. Do not replace pipe design capacity with a possibly different plant/unloader constraint.

Sources and location provenance

Sandur Kammathuru mine-to-rail project · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier D

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Kulda / Garjanbahal to Sardega CHP project · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier D

  • Mine-area reference computed from published bounds. It is not a crusher endpoint or the Sardega CHP receiving location; proposed pipe route untraced.

Sources and location provenance

Reftinskaya GRES hot-ash conveyor · Russia

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named GRES power-station reference. Ash conveyor route and disposal endpoint remain unresolved.

Sources and location provenance

SINCOR Jose CR-408 harbour conveyor · Venezuela

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • Pipe outer diameters: 623 mm carry strand, 588 mm return. Not equated with CKIT’s 5 km Lagoven project without matching project evidence.

Sources and location provenance

Skyline mine BC-8 · United States

Approximate route mapped · Installation evidence tier A

  • Existing approximate alignment retained with its original provenance. No claim of survey accuracy or present operation.
  • Operator filing reports 2.2 miles and 1,400 tons/h; ton basis is not assumed metric. CKIT’s 3.4 km Utah Fuel entry is a probable historical match, not an added installation.

Sources and location provenance

HKM Duisburg coal handling · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • HKM Huckingen steelworks reference. Four belts at the plant require separate route and duty identification.

Sources and location provenance

AES Maritza East 1 TC-3A ash conveyor · Bulgaria

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • AES Galabovo facility reference. Coal transport and TC-3A ash transport remain separate records; neither pin identifies its head/tail.
  • Outer diameters: 430 mm carry and 400 mm return. This is an ash system, distinct from CDI’s 2.7 km coal reference.

Sources and location provenance

Qatalum ship-unloader to smelter conveyor · Qatar

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Operator site-access reference at Mesaieed; site-access marker is not a belt endpoint. Alumina routes remain untraced.
  • 2,100 mm is belt width, not conveyor length; no route length is provided.

Sources and location provenance

Vigier 944 m limestone conveyor · Switzerland

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • The supplier and operator identify Reuchenette / Rondchâtel. Archive coordinate is an area reference only. The 244 m BEUMER and 944 m KOCH records remain separate; neither is assigned to a surveyed route.
  • Belt replaced in 2006; brochure reports over 25 years of operation.
  • The 944 m KOCH limestone system and BEUMER’s 244 m reference are retained separately pending route/asset identification. Do not merge just because both name Vigier.

Sources and location provenance

Moorburg power plant pipe-conveyor group · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Historical plant location; Vattenfall confirms closure in July 2021. Pipe removal/reuse has not been established.
  • Several assets are grouped at one plant. Brochure gives stacking 260 m / 630 mm / 3,000 t/h; reclaiming 215 m / 530 mm / 1,200 t/h; two bunker conveyors each 365 m / 530 mm / 1,200 t/h; gypsum 482 m / 530 mm / 1,000 t/h. Exact total conveyor count is not forced from ambiguous introductory wording.
  • Vattenfall confirms the host power plant closed in July 2021 and was sold to Hamburger Energiewerke effective March 1, 2023 for redevelopment. Individual conveyor removal/reuse is unverified; this A record establishes historical use, not a currently operating coal plant.

Sources and location provenance

Petronas RAPID sulphur pipe conveyor · Malaysia

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.
  • Commissioning year not stated; 2024 is publication date.

Sources and location provenance

Koidu diamond-concentrate conveyor · Sierra Leone

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Mine industrial area reference. The short secure concentrate conveyor is not identifiable at this overview scale.
  • A short conveyor carries concentrate to a secure area at 0.5 m/s. Length and commissioning year are not specified.

Sources and location provenance

Grindrod Richards Bay expansion pipe conveyor · South Africa

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • Retained separately from CKIT’s 2002 350 m and 412 m phosphate systems; a route-level identification is needed before relating them.

Sources and location provenance

Hidden Valley pit-to-plant conveyor · Papua New Guinea

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • OSM mine warehouse within the Hidden Valley industrial area is a reference lead. Mine-to-processing pipe route and terminal match require closer review.
  • DemcoTECH’s unnamed 4.5 km Papua New Guinea gold/silver example is a likely match but is not used to assert the mine’s supplier identity.

Sources and location provenance

Huainan Coal Mining MP · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • Historical customer name and dimensions only; exact route, commissioning date, supplier scope and current status need confirmation.

Sources and location provenance

Melaka refinery / Petronas · Malaysia

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Petronas Melaka refinery industrial footprint matched. Historical 5.3 km pipe route and current configuration are unverified.
  • Historical customer name and dimensions only; exact route, commissioning date, supplier scope and current status need confirmation.

Sources and location provenance

AES Barbers Point · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Historical AES Hawaii plant location. Current conveyor existence and use are not established by the historical CKIT source.
  • Historical customer name and dimensions only; exact route, commissioning date, supplier scope and current status need confirmation.

Sources and location provenance

Jordan Phosphate historical system · Jordan

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • Historical customer name and dimensions only; exact route, commissioning date, supplier scope and current status need confirmation.
  • Country is inferred from the historical Jordan Phosphate customer name; the exact installation location is not established.

Sources and location provenance

Ennore SEZ CRZ-area pipe conveyors · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier D

  • Vayalur project footprint matched. Construction-tagged mapping does not verify pipe-conveyor commissioning.
  • Do not assign an exact conveyor count or capacity per conveyor from the plural wording. Material is not explicitly given in the announcement.

Sources and location provenance

Ramanadurga downhill pipe-conveyor project · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier D

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Atocongo–Conchán ecological pipe conveyor · Peru

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • January 2008 clinker/cement guarantee tests were successful; coal transport guarantee tests remained outstanding at year end. Do not imply all duties were accepted then.
  • Capacity is the stated clinker transport rate, not proof of the system’s maximum design capacity.
  • Kept separate from Callao’s 3.195 km concentrates conveyor.

Sources and location provenance

NTECL Vallur port-to-plant coal conveyor · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Vallur plant matched separately from Ennore SEZ. Installed pipe conveyor is supported by operator maintenance procurement; port route not traced.
  • Plant commissioning milestones on the sheet are not treated as conveyor commissioning dates. The source’s historical largest-conveyor claim is not used as a current ranking.
  • The 2024–2026 tender is evidence of maintenance procurement for an installed asset, not proof of continuous operation in 2026.

Sources and location provenance

W. H. Sammis gypsum pipe conveyor · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named plant matched near Stratton. This is a facility reference; the approximately 2.4-mile gypsum route and present equipment condition are unverified.
  • Length is rounded from the source’s approximate 2.4 miles using 1 mile = 1,609.344 m (about 3,862 m before rounding). Converted digits do not imply survey precision.
  • The source also mentions annual limestone tonnage, which is not assigned as a gypsum conveyor hourly capacity. Present plant/conveyor status has not been reverified.

Sources and location provenance

Kitakyushu Sand Co-op first commercial JPC system · Japan

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • The installation year is explicit; a separate commissioning date is not given. Material and capacity are not specified in the reviewed passage.
  • The paper’s aggregate figures for other Japanese, Taiwanese and Australian installations are not expanded into unnamed site records.

Sources and location provenance

Wearmouth Colliery 300 m extension · United Kingdom

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Stadium of Light is a former-colliery area reference only. The historical trial/extension is not visible or assigned; do not imply a present conveyor.
  • Represents the 300 m extension of an 85 m trial introduced in 1988, not a sum of both lengths. The reported 300 mm diameter and 300 t/h rating are given for that predecessor trial; continuation into the extension is not separately specified.
  • The 12-month trial transported about one million tonnes; this operating total is not an hourly capacity. Present conveyor/colliery status is unverified.

Sources and location provenance

Westoe Colliery to Harton Staithes · United Kingdom

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Harton Staithes road gives a historical terminal-area lead. Westoe colliery-to-staithes alignment is not surveyed or demonstrated in present imagery.
  • The source reports discard transport on August 7, 1989 while commissioning and tracking work continued. A separate final acceptance date is not established.
  • Brief overload peaks are not used to replace the 300 t/h rated capacity. Diameter is left unset; the pipe-forming distance suggests 300 mm but this is not a direct specification in the reviewed Westoe section.

Sources and location provenance

Nuh Cement port/plant pipe transport · Turkey

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named Nuh industrial works at Hereke. Exact pipe route and dimensions await the original study or operator drawings.
  • The reviewed evidence is the original article abstract, coauthored by a Nuh Cement Plant contributor. Exact route, length, diameter, capacity, flight count and commissioning date await the full article or operator data.

Sources and location provenance

Batı Söke third-line limestone pipe conveyor · Turkey

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.
  • A completed-project reference establishes historical construction. No exact commissioning date or dimensions are supplied; the plant name alone is not used to infer a surveyed location.

Sources and location provenance

Jaypee Himachal Cement coal pipe conveyor · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • The same table lists a 1,088 m limestone engineering assignment without explicitly identifying it as pipe-belt transport; that entry is not included.

Sources and location provenance

Jaypee Dala clinker pipe conveyor · India

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.

Sources and location provenance

Paradeep Phosphates gypsum pipe-conveyor project · India

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Paradeep Phosphates industrial plant matched. Holtec study completion does not establish that the proposed gypsum pipe was built.
  • Project completion may refer to Holtec’s study rather than installed equipment. The 200–600 t/h range covers the material-handling system and is not assigned as a specific pipe-conveyor capacity.
  • The 2.91 km ordinary belt-conveyor portion is excluded from the pipe length.

Sources and location provenance

Dürnrohr port-to-power-plant coal conveyor · Austria

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Power/incineration-site area reference at Dürnrohr. Closed pipe system and present service need individual-route identification.
  • 2010 is the explicitly reported start of operation; a separate commissioning certificate/date has not been located.
  • Binder’s approximately 1,000-ton figure is total structural weight. It is not an hourly material capacity.
  • Historical operation is established; current service after changes at the host power plant has not been reverified.

Sources and location provenance

Schwenk Bernburg alternative-fuel conveyor · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Altenburger Chaussee works, verified against SCHWENK plant address. Substitute-fuel pipe route unresolved.
  • Route runs from the substitute-fuel warehouse to the main-burner feeding system.
  • 2014 is the original publication and commissioning year; the article’s 2020 web republication is not another installation.

Sources and location provenance

Wotan additional BEUMER clinker conveyor · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and source location agree. A site reference does not identify a specific belt, head pulley, tail pulley or surveyed route.
  • The article distinguishes the additional conveyor from an older pipe conveyor already used at Wotan.
  • The introduction rounds the length to 200 m; the detailed specification gives 213 m.
  • February 2015 is the stated beginning of successful operation. The exact commissioning date remains unset.
  • Binder’s separate 250 m Wotan/FLSmidth fabrication reference remains an unmatched asset lead and has not been merged or counted as another conveyor.

Sources and location provenance

Crossen–Helmsdorf remediation conveyor · Germany

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Pin is the Helmsdorf water-treatment facility, an area reference for the historic remediation route. Wismut reports pipe-conveyor dismantling completed September 2017.
  • Historical remediation duty, not an operating uranium-ore production conveyor.
  • The cumulative 3.25 million m³ moved during 1997–2016 is not an hourly capacity.
  • Status is supported by the 2017 reporting-year document, reviewed on 2026-10-04; dismantling finished in September 2017. The review date is not a dismantling date.

Sources and location provenance

Matola Terminal phase 3.5 pipe-conveyor works · Mozambique

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named source reviewed and location searches attempted. No defensible facility coordinate accepted; broad towns, headquarters, unrelated names and unmatched industrial sites are excluded.
  • The 7.3 million tons/year figure is terminal-wide annual throughput, not the pipe conveyor’s hourly capacity.
  • No individual conveyor count, dimensions or commissioning date is established by this reference.

Sources and location provenance

Prunéřov II historical ash pipe conveyor · Czech Republic

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Native plant POI may represent the wider Prunéřov site, including I and II. Exact historic closed-pipe route remains unassigned; subsequent U conveyor is a distinct configuration.
  • This record covers historical closed pipe-belt transport. A later U-shaped configuration is a different conveying form; current closed-pipe use has not been established.
  • The profile reports a 1,800 t/h fly-ash project in 2009–2012. The exact asset match to retrofit reference 22028Z is unresolved, so the capacity and dates are not assigned as specifications.
  • Generic product-page capacities are not installation ratings. Flight count and route identifiers require clarification.

Sources and location provenance

Moneypoint ash / FGD pipe-conveyor system · Ireland

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • ESB plant reference. Operator states coal generation ended June 2025; current service of the historical ash conveyors is unverified.
  • The 2024 report concerns changes to plant operation and ash management; its existing pipe conveyor is distinguished from proposed future ash-recovery works.
  • The exact one-to-one route match between M&F’s redundant ash conveyors and the described batching-to-truck process is unverified. Conveyor count and technical dimensions remain unknown.
  • Process-mixture proportions and weekly ash requirements are not pipe-conveyor capacity ratings.

Sources and location provenance

Denizli two-conveyor alternative-fuel system · Turkey

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Cement works industrial footprint matched. Two alternative-fuel conveyors remain individually untraced.
  • The 15 t/h rating is stated for each pipe conveyor, not an independently established 30 t/h system throughput. The figure caption explicitly says tonnes per hour.
  • October 2016 commissioning and January 2017 running statements describe different milestones. The portfolio’s February–December 2016 project period is not used as a commissioning date.
  • Pipe diameter is not established by the reviewed case.

Sources and location provenance

Ivano-Frankivsk limestone pipe-conveyor project · Ukraine

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Yamnytsya factory located, supported by operator’s 2026 company address. Project portfolio alone does not verify the conveyor’s commissioning.
  • August 2013–July 2014 is the reported project period, not a verified commissioning date.
  • The 250 t/h value is the project manager’s claim; an operator or original supplier project sheet is still needed.

Sources and location provenance

Lukavac alternative-fuel pipe-conveyor project · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Lukavac near Tuzla, not the unrelated settlement near Sarajevo. Alternative-fuel conveyor correspondence needs primary asset evidence.
  • February 2012–May 2013 is the reported project period. It is not assigned as commissioning date.
  • The 30 t/h capacity is a self-reported project value; supplier or operator documentation is still needed.

Sources and location provenance

Lagoven Amuay overland conveyor CV-9502 · Venezuela

Approximate route mapped · Installation evidence tier A

  • Existing approximate alignment retained with its original provenance. No claim of survey accuracy or present operation.
  • Design horizontal pulley centres are distinct from the length of the approximate mapped alignment.
  • The map follows the marked geographic drawing; endpoints and alignment are approximate.
  • Refinery upgrade dates are not used as conveyor commissioning dates. Current operation has not been reverified.
  • CKIT reports approximately 5.0 km and 300 tph for the Lagoven system. The register retains the original design horizontal-centre length and does not treat the legacy throughput as a current rating.

Sources and location provenance

  • Lagoven CRAY project: Amuay overland and wharf pipe-conveyor records · Project archive · Design criteria sheet STD-DS2, sheet 2 of 2; scanned archive p. 43; field-test records
  • Lagoven Amuay conveyor location drawing · Project archive · CV-9502 route and endpoints
  • Lagoven Refinery Upgrade and Expansion – EPC · Client and Location headings
  • Development of the pipe conveyor · Long pipe conveyor list: Fluor Daniel – Lagoven, 5.0 km
Lagoven Amuay wharf conveyor CV-9506 · Venezuela

Approximate route mapped · Installation evidence tier A

  • Existing approximate alignment retained with its original provenance. No claim of survey accuracy or present operation.
  • Design horizontal pulley centres are distinct from the length of the approximate mapped alignment.
  • The map follows the marked geographic drawing; endpoints and alignment are approximate.
  • Refinery upgrade dates are not used as conveyor commissioning dates. Current operation has not been reverified.

Sources and location provenance

  • Lagoven CRAY project: Amuay overland and wharf pipe-conveyor records · Project archive · Design criteria sheet STD-DS2, sheet 2 of 2; scanned archive p. 43; field-test records
  • Lagoven Amuay conveyor location drawing · Project archive · CV-9506 route and endpoints
  • Lagoven Refinery Upgrade and Expansion – EPC · Client and Location headings
ST Paper / ST Tissue Franklin pipe belt · United States

Approximate route mapped · Installation evidence tier A

  • Franklin, Virginia identity is established by the 2022 field report. This is separate from ST Paper’s Wisconsin operation.
  • Eight-vertex archived KMZ path overlays the visible mill corridor; approximately 1697 m horizontal, not a surveyed alignment or verified pulley-to-pulley design length.
  • The separate PipeBelt.kml and CSV include a GPS trip ending near Norfolk. Entire track distance, device altitudes and track endpoints are excluded from the conveyor route.
  • The report identifies three 50 hp tail motors and a 1600 mm Forech EP 1000/5 4+3 SAR/LRR replacement belt. Belt width is not the pipe diameter; motor ratings are not measured running power.
  • Pulley dimensions, complete belt-axis elevations and current service require further source review.
  • Approximately 1993 installation is a retrospective claim in the 2022 report. An exact installation or commissioning date has not been established.
  • The report says replacements appear to have occurred in 2007 and 2021; those dates remain qualified historical observations.
  • The 2022 report identifies a Forech 1600 EP 1000/5 4+3 SAR/LRR replacement belt and three 50 hp motors at the tail. Motor count does not imply three conveyors.
  • Eight-vertex archived KMZ path is approximately 1697 m horizontal, not a verified design centre distance or measured belt length; length remains null.
  • GPS files include travel away from the mill to the Norfolk area; whole-track endpoints, accumulated travel distance and device altitude are not conveyor geometry.
  • Krupp Robins plan and arrangement scans are archived in STTISSUE_A.pdf. Full dimension, profile and pulley transcription remains outstanding.
  • The near-one-mile FRP-to-machine separation and 250 tpd fiber-plant production in the 2013 feature are not a single-flight length or pipe-conveyor hourly capacity.

Sources and location provenance

  • Andrew Hustrulid: ST Paper Pipe Belt Site Visit · Project archive · February 1, 2022 walk; February 2 report, pages 1–3 and observations
  • Archived ST Paper KMZ path · Project archive · doc.kml / Untitled Path, eight vertices; zero altitude placeholders
  • Route extraction and limitations · Project archive · Approximate path length; GPS trip is not the belt alignment
  • Archived Krupp Robins drawings and meeting notes · Project archive · Scanned plans / arrangements; full engineering transcription outstanding
  • TAPPI Tissue360°: ST Tissue Franklin fiber recycling plant · Printed page 12, pulp transport description