Conveyor Maven · 5 October 2026

Troughed conveyor atlas

34 project and phase records, including Atlas Energy’s Texas belts, the Bangladesh LBC and Henderson in Colorado.

3Systems with mapped sections
11Facilities · belt untraced
12Tentative facility matches
8Unresolved locations
7Approximate route paths
Atlas Energy / Atlas Sands — Dune Express · Approximate archived routes mappedImpumelelo CV-2301 · Tentative facility matchCurragh North overland · Facility located · belt untracedLos Pelambres downhill system · Facility located · belt untracedSichuan Yadong - quarry to intermediate silo · Tentative facility matchSichuan Yadong - extension to cement plant · Tentative facility matchMärker Zement Harburg · Facility located · belt untracedRohrbach Zement / Dotternhausen · Tentative facility matchSchäfer Kalk / Diez · Tentative facility matchCiments Vigier / Reuchenette - troughed belt · Facility located · belt untracedHolcim Untervaz · Facility located · belt untracedTudela Veguin / La Robla · Facility located · belt untracedHalla Cement - 4,196 m reference · Tentative facility matchBinh Phuoc Cement · Tentative facility matchNational Cement / Ragland · Facility located · belt untracedALCOA Rockdale single flight · Tentative facility matchLehigh / Union Bridge - New Windsor quarry link · Facility located · belt untracedCortez Hills overland centerpiece · Tentative facility matchToromocho mine to processing plant · Tentative facility matchChannar CV-554 / CV-555 · Tentative facility matchEl Abra long flight · Tentative facility matchMuja / Collie long flight · Facility located · belt untracedHenderson mine-to-mill system · Surface route mapped · underground untracedObajana - 6.9 km elevated troughed conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedWyodak pit-to-plant curved conveyor · Facility located · belt untracedBangladesh LBC — Meghalaya to Chhatak · Approximate archived routes mapped
Mapped route sectionsFacility referenceTentative match

Loading the location records…

Evidence and scope

This is a selected research register of open and covered troughed conveyors. Its records describe sites, systems or phases; the count is not a count of individual belts or a worldwide operating census.

Atlas Energy has four approximate paths from existing Conveyor Maven mapping. The Bangladesh LBC has a 21-vertex archived KML path. Sparse vertices and small transfer gaps remain visible. Henderson has two approximate surface traces, checked against operator regulatory maps: the exposed PC2 portal approach and PC3 to the mill. Underground PC1/PC2 remain untraced.

Facility pins do not locate particular head or tail pulleys. Engineering lengths are source-reported values; geographic polyline lengths are approximate map measurements. Source tiers A–C describe installation evidence separately from location confidence.

Satellite retrieval dates do not establish capture dates or current operation. Interactive maps load third-party imagery only when you choose to open them.

Further research

All atlas records and sources

Browse the location assessments below or use the interactive atlas above. Installation evidence and location confidence are separate; a facility reference does not establish a surveyed conveyor route or current operation.

Atlas Energy / Atlas Sands — Dune Express · United States

Approximate archived routes mapped · Installation evidence tier A

  • Four existing Conveyor Maven map paths cover flights 105CV001, 110CV002, 115CV003 and 120CV004, from the Kermit plant west toward the delivery area. They are approximate archived map geometry, not surveyed pulley locations.
  • Multiple conveyor flights. CDI lists 68.5 km; retain the operator's rounded 42-mile system description. Covered trough classification inferred from system photographs and conventional overland design.
  • The four mapped polylines total approximately 67.394 km; this map measurement is separate from the operator’s rounded 42-mile system length. Short transfer gaps and sparse two-vertex flights are retained without inventing intermediate vertices.

Sources and location provenance

Impumelelo CV-2301 · South Africa

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • GEM mapped facility location and project identity agree. This location lead remains tentative until the exact asset is matched to a source plan; no pulley endpoint is implied.
  • Supplier prose says 2,400 t/h; its asset table says 1,920 t/h. Capacity conflict retained; no value selected.

Sources and location provenance

Curragh North overland · Australia

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.

Sources and location provenance

ZISCO / Redcliff overland · Zimbabwe

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier B

  • No facility search result has yet been accepted. Unrelated, office-only and town-centre results are rejected; no inferred asset pin.
  • CDI project sheet says construction 1997; its history and the 2005 paper say 1996. Year unresolved.

Sources and location provenance

Los Pelambres downhill system · Chile

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Three conveyor flights, largely in tunnels. Headline 12.7 km differs from the sum of the current asset table. Upgrade schedule includes 2000, 2008 and 2022; no single commissioning year selected.

Sources and location provenance

Sichuan Yadong - quarry to intermediate silo · China

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • GEM mapped facility location and project identity agree. This location lead remains tentative until the exact asset is matched to a source plan; no pulley endpoint is implied.
  • Brochure gives 12,560 m; other supplier accounts give 12.7 km. Same first phase, not additional installations.

Sources and location provenance

Sichuan Yadong - extension to cement plant · China

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Shared candidate cement-plant reference for the extension phase. No separate endpoints are inferred for its two conveyors.
  • Separate extension phase; the approximately 26 km headline combines it with the first phase.

Sources and location provenance

Märker Zement Harburg · Germany

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

Rohrbach Zement / Dotternhausen · Germany

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Modern Holcim cement works at the brochure town is a plausible successor facility to Rohrbach Zement; the specific historical asset is not independently matched.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

Schäfer Kalk / Diez · Germany

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • A SCHAEFER KALK plant and quarry at Hahnstätten is a possible match to the customer listed as Diez. This is a competing facility lead; the 1,550 m historical reference is not assigned to this site conclusively.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

Ciments Vigier / Reuchenette - troughed belt · Switzerland

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

Holcim Untervaz · Switzerland

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

Tudela Veguin / La Robla · Spain

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

Halla Cement - 4,196 m reference · South Korea

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • GEM mapped facility location and project identity agree. This location lead remains tentative until the exact asset is matched to a source plan; no pulley endpoint is implied.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.
  • Okgye main plant is a candidate host. Halla also has port and grinding facilities, and the brochure does not explicitly identify which site owns this belt.

Sources and location provenance

Binh Phuoc Cement · Vietnam

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • VICEM Ha Tien's Binh Phuoc integrated plant is a plausible host for the brochure project. Other plants use the same place name; the 9,950 m belt is not conclusively assigned to this facility.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

National Cement / Ragland · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier B

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Supplier reference establishes a named troughed project; commissioning and present operating status are not stated.

Sources and location provenance

ALCOA Rockdale single flight · United States

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Sandow power and former ALCOA complex is a plausible host. Exact historical belt endpoints remain unresolved; current operation not checked.

Sources and location provenance

Lehigh / Union Bridge - New Windsor quarry link · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Published plant address locates the Union Bridge destination. New Windsor quarry and the full intervening partly buried corridor remain untraced.

Sources and location provenance

Cortez Hills overland centerpiece · United States

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named Cortez Mine industrial area in Nevada is located, but the Hills conveyor within the wider mining complex is not yet matched.

Sources and location provenance

Cadman Washington downhill · United States

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • No facility search result has yet been accepted. Unrelated, office-only and town-centre results are rejected; no inferred asset pin.
  • Exact quarry identity needs confirmation; a Cadman business pin alone is a tentative match.

Sources and location provenance

Toromocho mine to processing plant · Peru

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named mine coordinate agrees with the source region and mine identity. Exact historical conveyor within the mine complex remains untraced; coordinate is a location lead.

Sources and location provenance

Channar CV-554 / CV-555 · Australia

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier B

  • Published mine coordinate agrees with the source region and mine identity. The imagery at this point does not independently isolate the historical conveyor works; this remains a location lead, with no terminal or route inferred.
  • CDI prose says Q4 1989 commissioning while its table says construction 1998. Dates conflict; no single year selected.

Sources and location provenance

El Abra long flight · Chile

Tentative facility match · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named mine coordinate agrees with the source region and mine identity. Exact historical conveyor within the mine complex remains untraced; coordinate is a location lead.

Sources and location provenance

  • Longer_Overland_Conveyors_with_Distributed_Power.pdf · Project archive · PDF page 1
Muja / Collie long flight · Australia

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.

Sources and location provenance

  • Longer_Overland_Conveyors_with_Distributed_Power.pdf · Project archive · PDF page 1
BHP DRI bidirectional system · Australia

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • No facility search result has yet been accepted. Unrelated, office-only and town-centre results are rejected; no inferred asset pin.
  • Boodarie is a candidate host-site identity inferred from BHP DRI description; exact asset match unresolved.

Sources and location provenance

  • Longer_Overland_Conveyors_with_Distributed_Power.pdf · Project archive · PDF page 1
Henderson mine-to-mill system · United States

Surface route mapped · underground untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • The exposed PC2 portal approach and PC3 corridor to the mill are mapped approximately from satellite imagery, checked against the operator’s stormwater plan.
  • Amber: surface portion of PC2 (about 1.420 km geographic trace). Cyan: PC3 (about 6.268 km geographic trace). The common reference is the PC2/PC3 transfer building.
  • Underground PC1 and PC2 alignments remain untraced. The displayed 7.687 km surface trace is not the complete 24 km mine-to-mill system.
  • The traces follow the covered corridor and approximate terminal buildings; they do not locate surveyed belt axes or individual pulley centres.
  • 2004 paper gives December 1999 commissioning; the 2005 summary says installed in 2000. Retain explicit commissioning date. Much of the route is underground.
  • The engineering paper labels PC3 6,400 m and its plan 20,567 ft (about 6,269 m); the mapped geographic polyline is 6,267.703 m. Map vertices were selected from imagery without scaling to an engineering length.
  • Küng reports PC2 at 16,825 m; the earlier summary gives 16.28 km. Retain the source conflict, and distinguish the short surface trace from the full underground/surface flight.

Sources and location provenance

Landau - Navigation Plant to RLT · South Africa

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier A

  • No facility search result has yet been accepted. Unrelated, office-only and town-centre results are rejected; no inferred asset pin.
  • Commissioning and testing documented; 1993 is an award year, not a confirmed commissioning year.

Sources and location provenance

  • 1.design of a long overland conveyor with tight horizontal curves.pdf · Project archive · PDF pages 1–2
Obajana - 6.9 km elevated troughed conveyor · Nigeria

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier A

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.
  • Paper calls the plant Objana; modern spelling Obajana. Dry commissioning occurred in autumn 2006; wet commissioning was still pending when the paper was written.

Sources and location provenance

  • Kruse & Gibbs - 6.9 km Horizontally Curved Troughed Conveyor (Beltcon, Pulley Library copy) · Project archive · PDF page 1
Tianjin Port coal overland · China

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • No facility search result has yet been accepted. Unrelated, office-only and town-centre results are rejected; no inferred asset pin.
  • The port hosts many conveyors; the 2004 asset identity requires a terminal-specific match.

Sources and location provenance

  • Latest Developments in Belt Conveyor Technology.pdf · Project archive · PDF pages 2–3
Wyodak pit-to-plant curved conveyor · United States

Facility located · belt untraced · Installation evidence tier C

  • Named facility and regional location agree with the project source. Pin identifies the host facility; the individual conveyor remains untraced.

Sources and location provenance

  • Latest Developments in Belt Conveyor Technology.pdf · Project archive · PDF pages 2–3
ERWIN / Evergreen Mining curved conveyor · United States

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Source identifies an engineering assignment, but does not yet establish the specific belt site or route. No pin assigned.
  • Fairmont address belongs to the contractor. It is not evidence of the belt location. No pin assigned.

Sources and location provenance

  • Beumer 1992 - Installation Report, Horizontally Curved Belt Conveyor, Project ERWIN (Erwin Industries).pdf · Project archive · PDF page 1
DART tunneling - northbound and southbound designs · United States

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Source identifies an engineering assignment, but does not yet establish the specific belt site or route. No pin assigned.
  • Design evidence only; exact tunnel portals and temporary conveyor status unresolved. No Dallas city-centre pin assigned.

Sources and location provenance

  • Tooker 1992 - Horizontal Curve Design for DART Tunneling Project (16-page excerpt).pdf · Project archive · PDF page 1
Perini / Chicago Tunnel - conveyors 1 and 2 · United States

Location unresolved · Installation evidence tier C

  • Source identifies an engineering assignment, but does not yet establish the specific belt site or route. No pin assigned.
  • Design correspondence alone does not identify the underground alignment or establish operation. No Chicago city-centre pin assigned.

Sources and location provenance

  • Tooker 1993 - Horizontal Curve Analysis for Perini Chicago Tunnel Project (letter and data sheets for Continental Conveyor).pdf · Project archive · PDF page 1
Bangladesh LBC — Meghalaya to Chhatak · Bangladesh

Approximate archived routes mapped · Installation evidence tier A

  • Archived KML follows the corridor from Meghalaya, India, south to the Chhatak plant in Bangladesh. The endpoint coordinates are map vertices, not surveyed pulley centres.
  • Operator identifies the 17 km elevated cross-border conveyor supplying the Surma plant at Chhatak from its Meghalaya quarry. The 2022 report records limestone transport that year; current operation is not inferred from archived imagery.
  • The 16.913 km map-polyline length is an approximate geographic measurement of 21 archived vertices, separate from the rounded 17 km engineering length.

Sources and location provenance

Explore Conveyor Maven calculations

The installation atlas is a research resource. Conveyor Maven is the released calculator app for belt conveyor design and analysis.